Compare
Evalezy vs CrazyGoldFish
| Evalezy | CrazyGoldFish | |
|---|---|---|
| Made for | schools, coaching institutes, UPSC/PSC programmes, colleges, exam bodies, edtech platforms (API) | schools, coaching networks, edtech platforms and NGOs (evaluation infrastructure and APIs) |
| Entry price | ₹1 / page ($0.01 outside India); failed and unreadable copies free | On request |
| Reads handwriting | Yes. Reads scanned or phone-photographed handwritten copies (PDF) | Yes. "scores handwritten, subjective answers at scale" |
| AI marks written answers | Yes. Marks every answer against a marking scheme per question | Yes. Exam Evaluation and Assignment Evaluation products score subjective answers |
| Maths working | Yes. Reads maths working; unsure equation lines get a second read by an equation reader. Diagrams judged by labels only | Partly. Homepage examples use calculus and fractions with step-level notes ("Misses sign convention at step 3"); no STEM documentation |
| Rubric / marking scheme | Yes. AI-drafted or teacher-written criteria per question that add up to the marks; model answers | Yes. Responses are interpreted against rubrics |
| Partial marks + reasons | Yes. Half-mark steps with a written reason per question and criteria breakdown | Partly. Output includes concept, error type, mastery, confidence and suggested action; partial-mark reasons not explicitly shown |
| Typed answers | Yes. Grades typed long answers (essays, letters, emails) from online tests | Not documented. Assignment Evaluation listed; typed answer grading not described |
| Indian languages | No. English answers only; Hindi/regional copies fail with language_not_supported (not charged) | Yes. Vendor reports reliability alpha 0.808 on Hindi handwritten answers across 2 states and 7 subjects |
| Bulk scan upload | Yes. Up to 200 PDFs per upload in the dashboard; API uploads up to 100 PDFs per call | Not documented. Pitches high-volume mock evaluation for coaching networks; batch upload not described |
| Identifies the student | Yes. Reads name, roll number and class from the top of page 1 and matches to the class list; never guesses | Not documented. Not mentioned |
| Annotated copy back | Yes. Returns the student's own copy checked in a handwriting-style red pen with marks and notes | Not documented. Not mentioned |
| Teacher review | Yes. AI marks are drafts; teacher reviews, overrides and releases (dashboard) or finalizes (API) | Yes. Human-in-the-loop, governed review; teachers remain "the final authority" |
| Paper import | Yes. Upload the question paper and it is read into questions with marks (dashboard) | Not documented. Not mentioned |
| Public API | Yes. Evaluation API v1 live since 2 Oct 2026, docs at docs.evalezy.com | Partly. Evaluation APIs offered with a sample endpoint on the homepage; no public API documentation found |
| Integrity checks | No. No plagiarism or AI-writing detection on answers today | Not documented. Not mentioned |
CrazyGoldFish's side is read from its public pages in October 2026 (2026-10-22) for our evaluation landscape research; "not documented" means we could not find it described, not that it is impossible. Evalezy's side is scored the same way from its own pages. Spot something out of date? Send us a source and we will correct it.
Sources:CrazyGoldFish: homepageCrazyGoldFish: scalefull research
Choose CrazyGoldFish when
- Answers are handwritten in Hindi (CrazyGoldFish reports an alpha of 0.808 on Hindi handwritten answers)
- You want per-answer learning analytics: concept, error type, mastery and a suggested action
- You run a government or NGO programme (it is listed on the IndiaAI and AIKosh portals)
Choose Evalezy when
- Teachers need to upload 200 copies, have them matched to students and review the marks themselves
- Students should receive their own copy checked in red pen
- You want a published price (₹1 per page) and public API documentation at docs.evalezy.com
The difference in one line
CrazyGoldFish is an evaluation engine that platforms build on. Evalezy is both: a dashboard teachers use end to end, and an Evaluation API with public docs for platforms.
What is documented
CrazyGoldFish documents rubric-based scoring, Hindi results and teacher-final review. Bulk upload, student identification, annotated copies and question paper import are not described on its pages. Evalezy documents all four.
| Q | Score | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q5 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q6 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q21 | 1.5 / 2 | Partially correct |
| Q30 | 0.5 / 3 | Partially correct |
A number per question. The student never sees where on the page they went wrong.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which should an edtech platform choose?+
If you need Hindi handwritten answers today, CrazyGoldFish documents results on them. If your answers are in English and you want to integrate without a sales cycle first, Evalezy's Evaluation API is documented publicly at docs.evalezy.com, priced per page, and returns question-wise marks, reasons and the checked copy PDF.
See your own copies checked.
Book a 20-minute demo. Bring a question paper and a few scanned answer sheets, and watch Evalezy check them in red pen.