Compare
Evalezy vs Acadine
| Evalezy | Acadine | |
|---|---|---|
| Made for | schools, coaching institutes, UPSC/PSC programmes, colleges, exam bodies, edtech platforms (API) | coaching institutes and schools in India (CBSE, ICSE, state boards, JEE/NEET, UPSC, CA/CMA/CS), single- and multi-branch |
| Entry price | ₹1 / page ($0.01 outside India); failed and unreadable copies free | On request |
| Reads handwriting | Yes. Reads scanned or phone-photographed handwritten copies (PDF) | Yes. "Evaluate handwritten answer sheets"; "Understands handwriting, formulas, diagrams, and working steps" |
| AI marks written answers | Yes. Marks every answer against a marking scheme per question | Yes. Tests: answer sheets are uploaded after the test and "automatically evaluated by AI within 24 hours" |
| Maths working | Yes. Reads maths working; unsure equation lines get a second read by an equation reader. Diagrams judged by labels only | Yes. Step-wise marking: "Awards accurate partial marks and identifies working errors line by line"; formulas named |
| Rubric / marking scheme | Yes. AI-drafted or teacher-written criteria per question that add up to the marks; model answers | Yes. "Standardized rubrics applied ... across every teacher and paper"; how a teacher sets or edits a rubric per question is not described |
| Partial marks + reasons | Yes. Half-mark steps with a written reason per question and criteria breakdown | Yes. Partial credit for working steps; "Detailed feedback provided for every question" |
| Typed answers | Yes. Grades typed long answers (essays, letters, emails) from online tests | Not documented. Online CBT tests with instant grading shown for objective (+4/-1) questions; grading of typed long answers not described |
| Indian languages | No. English answers only; Hindi/regional copies fail with language_not_supported (not charged) | Yes. Homepage hero: "22 Indian languages"; the evaluation section lists "English, Hindi, and Sanskrit" |
| Bulk scan upload | Yes. Up to 200 PDFs per upload in the dashboard; API uploads up to 100 PDFs per call | Yes. Admins scan and upload a test's answer sheets; docs: "Grade 1000+ handwritten answer sheets in 24 hours" |
| Identifies the student | Yes. Reads name, roll number and class from the top of page 1 and matches to the class list; never guesses | Not documented. How an uploaded sheet is matched to its student is not described; the Upload Answer Sheets guide is marked "Coming Soon" |
| Annotated copy back | Yes. Returns the student's own copy checked in a handwriting-style red pen with marks and notes | Not documented. Per-question feedback and scorecards are shown; returning the student's own sheet marked up page by page is not described |
| Teacher review | Yes. AI marks are drafts; teacher reviews, overrides and releases (dashboard) or finalizes (API) | Partly. Teacher guide: AI evaluates, then "automatically publishes results to students"; students can raise a Challenge Grade. No review step before release described |
| Paper import | Yes. Upload the question paper and it is read into questions with marks (dashboard) | Partly. Papers are made in Acadine (AI Auto Generate or Build with AI, own questions added); reading an existing paper PDF into questions is not described |
| Public API | Yes. Evaluation API v1 live since 2 Oct 2026, docs at docs.evalezy.com | Not documented. No public grading API documented; docs.acadine.ai covers the dashboard only |
| Integrity checks | No. No plagiarism or AI-writing detection on answers today | Not documented. Fullscreen proctoring for online tests; plagiarism or AI-writing detection on answers not described |
Acadine's side is read from its public pages in October 2026 (2026-10-29) for our evaluation landscape research; "not documented" means we could not find it described, not that it is impossible. Evalezy's side is scored the same way from its own pages. Spot something out of date? Send us a source and we will correct it.
Sources:Acadine: homepageAcadine: capabilitiesAcadine: teacher reviewAcadine: question paper importAcadine: student identificationfull research
Choose Acadine when
- Answers are written in Hindi or Sanskrit (Acadine lists English, Hindi and Sanskrit; Evalezy grades English only for now)
- You want one vendor for AI question papers, OMR sheets, online CBT tests, timetables and announcements as well as checking
- You want multi-branch analytics down to chapter and topic, and a white-label student app
- You want scorecards sent to parents on WhatsApp straight after evaluation
Choose Evalezy when
- Teachers must see and edit every AI mark before students do (Acadine's teacher guide says results publish automatically)
- Students should get their own copy back with ticks, crosses, notes and the total circled, not just a scorecard
- You upload a pile of copies and want each matched to the right student by the name and roll number on page one
- You want to know the price before a sales call: ₹1 per page, failed and unreadable copies free
- You already have an LMS or exam system and want a public grading API (docs.evalezy.com)
The difference in one line
Acadine is an institute operating system with AI checking inside it. Evalezy is a copy-checking engine: it does not schedule your lectures, but it documents 12 of the 14 checking capabilities in our research to Acadine's 8, and it plugs into the Vacademy platform or your own system through the API.
Who releases the marks
In Acadine's teacher guide, admins upload the sheets, AI evaluates them within 24 hours and results are published to students automatically; students can then challenge a grade. In Evalezy every AI mark lands as a draft, the teacher reviews the reasons per question, edits what they disagree with and presses Release Result. A teacher's edit is never overwritten by a later AI run.
Accuracy claims
Acadine's homepage claims 98%+ accuracy, benchmarked against faculty. Evalezy publishes no accuracy percentage. Instead we published one maths copy checked by a teacher and by Evalezy, page by page: Evalezy caught 2 slips the teacher ticked and misread 5 answers the teacher got right. That is why our marks wait for a teacher. Ask any vendor, us included, to check a batch your teachers have already marked.
Price
Acadine does not publish prices; you book a demo. Evalezy charges ₹1 per page checked in India and $0.01 elsewhere, with no subscription or setup fee, and nothing for failed, stopped or unreadable copies.
| Q | Score | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q5 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q6 | 0 / 1 | Incorrect |
| Q21 | 1.5 / 2 | Partially correct |
| Q30 | 0.5 / 3 | Partially correct |
A number per question. The student never sees where on the page they went wrong.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is Evalezy an Acadine alternative?+
For checking handwritten answer sheets in English, yes: Evalezy marks every answer against a scheme per question, returns the student's own copy checked in red pen, matches copies to students by name and roll number and keeps the teacher in charge of release, at ₹1 a page. If you want one suite for question papers, OMR, online tests, analytics and a branded app, or need Hindi answers checked, Acadine covers more of that today.
Does Evalezy have a mobile app like Acadine?+
They are different apps. Acadine's app is a white-label app for students, teachers and admins. The Evalezy app, launching soon, is a checking tool: a teacher scans each copy with the phone camera or picks PDFs, runs the AI check for the whole batch and downloads the checked copies. Students still get their checked copy by email when you release results.
Can I use both?+
Yes. Some institutes keep their institute platform for timetables, tests and analytics and send handwritten copies to a specialist checker. Evalezy's Evaluation API takes each copy as a PDF and returns marks per question, reasons and the checked copy PDF, as drafts your teachers finalize.
See your own copies checked.
Book a 20-minute demo. Bring a question paper and a few scanned answer sheets, and watch Evalezy check them in red pen.